Skip to content
International Journal of Financial Innovations & Risk Management

International Journal of Financial Innovations & Risk Management

IJFIRM

  • About the Journal
    • Our Vision
    • Editorial Board
    • Ethics & Disclosure Policy
    • Contact the Journal
    • Editorial Policies
  • For Authors
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Pre-Submission Checklist
    • Journal Policies/Procedure
    • Rights and Permissions
    • How to Publish With IJFIRM
    • Latest Focus Areas
    • Fees & Funding
  • Call for Paper
  • Online Submission
  • Contact Us
  • Archive
  • Toggle search form

The Dark Side of Artificial Intelligence in Finance: Measuring the Negative Impacts of Blind AI Adoption on Investor Decision-Making

International Journal of Financial Innovations & Risk Management (IJFIRM)
2025 – Volume 1 – Issue 1 – Pages 136–162

Authors:

Ahmed Ali

COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an essential tool in modern finance, shaping how investors evaluate risks, manage portfolios, and respond to market fluctuations. While its efficiency, speed, and predictive power have been widely celebrated, the blind adoption of AI presents significant challenges to investor decision-making. This study explores the negative impacts of over-reliance on AI-driven systems, particularly the risks of technical failures, panic-driven behavior, algorithmic biases, and the illusion of rationality that may distort investor perceptions. Using data from a survey of 500 investors and analyzed with SPSS regression models, the findings reveal that reliance on AI significantly shapes investor decisions. At the same time, concerns about technical failure remain the dominant factor influencing trust and comparative judgment. Surprisingly, perceptions of “reasonable” AI reduce investor confidence, suggesting skepticism toward overly human-like rationality in automated systems. The results highlight the paradox of AI adoption in finance: while investors increasingly depend on its predictive capabilities, they remain deeply concerned about hidden risks, lack of transparency, and potential behavioral distortions. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on the dark side of AI by emphasizing the need for safeguards, regulatory oversight, and investor education. By identifying the adverse consequences of blind AI adoption, this study underscores the importance of balanced integration—where technological innovation is matched with ethical governance and critical awareness.

IReferences

  1. Băltescu, C.A. (2021) ‘Artificial intelligence adoption in financial services: Benefits and risks’, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), pp. 1–15.
  2. Goodman, B. and Flaxman, S. (2017) ‘European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”’, AI Magazine, 38(3), pp. 50–57.
  3. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica, 47(2), pp. 263–291.
  4. Fama, E.F. (1970) ‘Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work’, Journal of Finance, 25(2), pp. 383–417.
  5. Brennan, T. and Lo, A. (2019) ‘AI in finance: Theory and practice’, Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4), pp. 14–28.
  6. Agrawal, A., Gans, J. and Goldfarb, A. (2018) Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press.
  7. De Franco, C., Moneta, F. and Veltri, S. (2020) ‘Machine learning applications in asset management’, Journal of Asset Management, 21(3), pp. 167–178.
  8. Rudin, C. (2019) ‘Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead’, Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), pp. 206–215.
  9. O’Neil, C. (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown.
  10. BIS (Bank for International Settlements) (2021) Big tech in finance: Regulatory approaches. Basel: BIS.
  11. Mosier, K.L. and Skitka, L.J. (1996) ‘Human decision makers and automated decision aids: Made for each other?’, Human Factors, 38(4), pp. 553–564.
  12. Dietvorst, B.J., Simmons, J.P. and Massey, C. (2015) ‘Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), pp. 114–126.
  13. Arner, D.W., Barberis, J. and Buckley, R.P. (2017) ‘FinTech and RegTech: Impact on regulators and banks’, Journal of Banking Regulation, 19(4), pp. 1–14.
  14. Knight Capital Group (2012) Annual Report: Lessons from the trading glitch. New York: Knight Capital.
  15. Shiller, R.J. (2000) Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press.
  16. Banerjee, A.V. (1992) ‘A simple model of herd behavior’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), pp. 797–817.
  17. Burrell, J. (2016) ‘How the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms’, Big Data & Society, 3(1), pp. 1–12.
  18. Barocas, S. and Selbst, A.D. (2016) ‘Big data’s disparate impact’, California Law Review, 104(3), pp. 671–732.
  19. Mittelstadt, B.D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S. and Floridi, L. (2016) ‘The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate’, Big Data & Society, 3(2), pp. 1–21.
  20. IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commissions) (2021) AI and machine learning in financial services. Madrid: IOSCO.
  21. Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S. and Sunstein, C.R. (2018) ‘Discrimination in the age of algorithms’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 10, pp. 113–174.
  22. OECD (2021) OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. Paris: OECD.
  23. Floridi, L. and Cowls, J. (2019) ‘A unified framework of five principles for AI in society’, Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1), pp. 1–15.
  24. Financial Stability Board (FSB) (2022) Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services. Basel: FSB.
  25. Autor, D. (2015) ‘Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), pp. 3–30.
  26. Campbell-Verduyn, M. (2021) Bitcoin and beyond: Cryptocurrencies, blockchain, and global governance. Routledge.
  27. CFTC (2020) Managing artificial intelligence in derivatives trading. Washington, DC: U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
  28. Chen, M., Mao, S. and Liu, Y. (2019) ‘Big data: A survey’, Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(2), pp. 171–209.
  29. ECB (European Central Bank) (2020) Artificial intelligence in financial services: Challenges and opportunities. Frankfurt: ECB.
  30. EBA (European Banking Authority) (2021) Report on Big Data and Advanced Analytics. Paris: EBA.
  31. Gai, K., Qiu, M. and Sun, X. (2018) ‘A survey on FinTech’, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 103, pp. 262–273.
  32. Jagtiani, J. and Lemieux, C. (2019) ‘The roles of big data and machine learning in fintech lending: Evidence from the LendingClub consumer platform’, Journal of Economics and Business, 100, pp. 29–46.
  33. Lo, A.W. (2017) Adaptive Markets: Financial Evolution at the Speed of Thought. Princeton University Press.
  34. Nass, C. and Moon, Y. (2000) ‘Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers’, Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), pp. 81–103.
  35. Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994) Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  36. PwC (2019) AI in financial services: How to manage the risks. London: PwC.
  37. Silver, D., Huang, A. and Maddison, C.J. (2016) ‘Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search’, Nature, 529, pp. 484–489.
  38. Sjöberg, L. (2000) ‘Factors in risk perception’, Risk Analysis, 20(1), pp. 1–11.
  39. Trist, E. (1981) ‘The evolution of socio-technical systems’. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Labour.
  40. UNCTAD (2021) Technology and innovation report: Catching technological waves. Geneva: United Nations.
  41. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. and Floridi, L. (2017) ‘Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation’, International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), pp. 76–99.
  42. World Bank (2020) Artificial Intelligence in Finance: Opportunities and Challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  43. Yoshino, N. and Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2019) ‘Digital innovation and the future of finance’, Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper No. 922.
  44. Zhang, W., Zhao, J. and Chen, J. (2020) ‘The impact of artificial intelligence on financial markets’, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(11), pp. 1–18.
  45. Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. London: Profile Books.
  46. FSB (Financial Stability Board) (2020) Global monitoring report on non-bank financial intermediation. Basel: FSB.
  47. European Commission (2022) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Brussels: EC.
  48. Gill, T. (2020) ‘Consumer trust in artificial intelligence: A behavioral perspective’, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(5), pp. 451–462.
  49. Brynjolfsson, E. and McAfee, A. (2017) Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. New York: W.W. Norton.
  50. Caruana, R. et al. (2015) ‘Intelligible models for healthcare: Predicting pneumonia risk and hospital readmission’, Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1721–1730.
  51. Ghosh, R. and Vinod, D. (2021) ‘AI, ethics, and investor trust in financial services’, Finance Research Letters, 43, 102010.
  52. Hendershott, T., Jones, C.M. and Menkveld, A.J. (2011) ‘Algorithmic trading and information’, Journal of Finance, 66(1), pp. 1–33.
  53. Liu, Y. and Serletis, A. (2019) ‘Volatility in cryptocurrency markets’, Journal of Empirical Finance, 54, pp. 56–70.
  54. Markose, S. (2013) ‘Systemic risk from global financial derivatives: A network analysis of contagion and its mitigation with super-spreader tax’, IMF Working Papers, 13/14, pp. 1–42.

Copyright © 2025 IJFIRM

Powered by PressBook Blog WordPress theme

Powered by
...
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by